Kuzey Kýbrýs Türk Cumhuriyeti YasalarýTüzüklerMahkemeler HakkýndaSýkça Sorulan SorularBaðlanti Kurun 07.01.2009

   Kullanıcı: 38.103.63.58                                                                                                                                                                                                Anasayfa

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi > Fihristi                                                                                                                                                                   Yasalar Ana Sayfa

Toplam İşlenen AIHM Sayısı: 28 Aktif Sayfa: 1
Tarih   Numara   Mahkeme  Taraf Konu
22.11.200538595/97AİHMChriso Kakoulli, Andreas Kakoulli, Martha Kakoulli, Kyriaki Kakoulli, GKRY (başvuranlar yanında müdahil) – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,yaşama hakkının ihlali
31.03.200538187/97AİHMİlkay Adalı – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,yaşama hakkı, toplanma ve örgütlenme özgürlüğü
22.12.200546347/99AİHMMyra Xenides-Arestis, GKRY (başvuran yanında müdahil) – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,mülkiyet hakkı, özel yaşama, aile yaşamına, konut özgürlüğüne saygı
31.07.200316163/90AİHMEugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd., Michael Tymvios, GKRY (başvuranlar yanında müdahil) – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,mülkiyet hakkı
31.07.200316219/90AİHMJohn (Ionnis) Demades, GKRY (başvuran yanında müdahil) – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,mülkiyet hakkı, özel yaşama, aile yaşamına ve konut özgürlüğüne saygı
18.12.199615318/89AİHMTitina Loizidou, GKRY– Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,Mülkiyet hakkı
10.05.200125781/94AİHMGKRY – Türkiye Cumhuriyeti,yaşam hakkı, kişi özgürlüğü ve güvenliği, insanlık dışı ve onur kırıcı muamele yasağı, özel yaşama, aile yaşamına, konut özgürlüğüne saygı, mülkiyet hakkı, etkili başvuru hakkı, düşünce, din ve vicdan özgürlüğü, düşünceyi açıklama özgürlüğü, eğitim hakkı, adil yargılanma hakkı
1953 July, 1Appeal No. 6.Turkish Family CourtAHMED MOULLA MOUSTAFA OF FAMAGUSTA v. EMINE ALI OSMAN OF KOROVIA,Divorce on ground of adultery under set. 26 of the Turkish Family (Marriage and Divorce) Law, 1951 –– No suit for divorce after the expiration of six months from the occurrence of the event constituting the ground of divorce.
1955 Nov. 12Appeal No: 2016Criminal AppealMıchalakis Savva Karaolides v. The Queen,Criminal Law – Evidence of motive on murder charge – Wrongful admission of – No miscarriage of justice.
1954, April 17Appeal No: 4078Civil AppealJohn G. Eliades v. 1. The Executor of the Will of the Deceased Nicolas P. Lanitis, 2. Sir Panayıotis Cocoyannis as Executor of the Will,Estate duty – Apportionment among beneficiaries – Wills and Succession-Law, section 32.
1955 March, 23Appeal No. 1/55Turkish Family CourtSevgi Mouharem v. Ezel Nazım Nouri,Turkish Family (Marriage and Divorce) Law, 1951, section 25(c) – Infamous crime as ground for divorce – What constitutes infamous crime – Prior prosecution unnecessary.
1956 Dec. 29, 1957 Jan. 24Appeal No.2073Criminal AppealM. Shefik Hıfzı v. The Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councillors and Townsmen of Kyrenia,Street and Buildings Regulations –Conditions imposed in permit –Street an Buildings Regulations (made under Cap 165), regulation 13, proviso to paragraph (3) (c) Building – Balcony – Conditions in permit – Balcony not projecting beyond street alignment – Streets and Buildings Regulations, regulation 13. Construction of regulation – Proviso to regulation – Construed together with main part of regulation – Streets and Buildings Regulations, regulation 13, proviso to paragraph 3 (c)
1956 December, 15Application 16/195Criminal Application Vassos Papadopoullos and others v. The Commissioner of Limassol,Certiorari –– Emergency Powers (Collective Fine) Regulations, 1955 –– Ultra vires Emergency Powers Orders in Council, 1939 and 1952 –– Provisions of Regulations 5 (Inquiry by Commissioner) not complied with –– Upon certiorari Order under Regulation 3 quashed.
1957 June 27, Oct. 19Appeal No. 4222Civil AppealLambris Haralambous Papa Loizou v. Kornellia Themistokleous,Immovable Property––Mistake in Land Registry record ––Prescrip-tion Rectification of mistake––Application to Director of Land Registration in first instance––Court' s jurisdiction only by way of appeal from Director's decision––Immovable Property (Tenure, Registration and Valuation) Law, Cap. 231, Sections 56, 59 and 75.
1957 Oct. 10, Dec.31Appeal No. 4218Civil AppealEvripides G. Iannides and another v. Rodothea G. Ioannides,Water––Water rights––Transfer of water rights––Water rights held independent of any spring or water course––Not subject to registration prior to enactment of Immovable Property (Tenure, Registration and Valuation) Law, Cap. 231. Immovable Property––Immovable Property (Tenure, Registration and Valuation) Law, Cap. 231, sections 2 and 39.
1957 Dec. 3Appeal No. 2127Criminal AppealStavros Cornelıou v. The Police,Evidence in, criminal cases––Confession-Dispute as to admissibility– Right of accused to give evidence––Procedure to be followed––Accused may give evidence before or after his witnesses–– Discretion of Court––Criminal Procedure Law, Cap.14, section, 72 (1) (d).
1957 Dec. 18, 1958 Jan. 18.Appeal No. 4240Civil AppealM. Salim Aziz v. M. Fevzi Akarsou,Protected premises –– Rent restriction –– Business premises –– Grant by the Court of a new tenancy to a tenant of business premises against whom an order of ejectment was made under the provisions of the Rent (Control) Law) 1954) Section 18 (1) (i) or (j) –– Application for grant of such tenancy under Section 20. “Business premises ”, “Dwelling house” ––Meaning –– Section 2 –– Two separate physical entities subject to a single lease –– Each one of such entities should be considered separately for the purpose of ascertaining whether it is "business premises" or "dwelling house”, notwithstanding that both are held under one letting instrument and constitute the component parts of one building
1957 June 27, Oct. 12.Appeal No. 4224Civil AppealCostas Korallis v. Cleanthis Christoforou and others,Civil Procedure––Mode of trial––Libel action-Substantial damages claimed-Proof of innuendo––Justification––Who is "first party " under Civil Procedure Rules, Order 33, rule 7. Practice ––Ruling under Civil Procedure Rules, Order 33, role 7–– Whether appealable––Courts of Justice Law, 1953, section 27.
1957 March 1, April 5.Appeal No. 4209Civil AppealNicos Droushiotis v. Zenon Kyrianides,Civil Wrong––Negligence––Strict liability––Printing machine–– Not a dangerous thing within section 48 of the Civil Wrongs Law, Cap. 9––Child––Licence––Duty of occupier––Allurement to child.
1957 March 2, 8.Appeal No. 2079Criminal AppealRegina v. Hussein Ahmed Koutchouk,Emergency Regulations –– Possessing firearm –– Lawful authority or lawful excuse –– Standard of proof required to establish it –– Emergency Powers (Public Safety and Order) Regulations, 1955 to (No.16) 1956, Regulation 52 (c). Evidence in criminal cases –– Onus of proof on accused –– Standard of proof –– Burden discharged by evidence of probability.
1957 March 22, 26.Appeal No. 2082Criminal AppealAndreas Kleanthous Haji Georghiou v. The Police,Criminal Law––Meaning of "taking upon himself the disposition" –– Inciting to steal––Property of Her Majesty (Theft and Possession) Law, Gap. 28, section 2 (1) (b)––Criminal Code, Cap.13, sections 249 and 364 (a) and (b).Criminal Procedure––Powers of Supreme Court on appeal by accused ––Power to convict of offence of which accused has been acquitted––Criminal Procedure Law, Gap. 14, section 142 (1) (c).
1957 March, 26.Appeal No. 2088Criminal AppealRegina v. Shevki Redjeb,Evidence in criminal cases––Child––Corroboration––Sworn Evidence.
1957 Nov. 5.Appeals Nos. 2125 and 2126Criminal AppealsIoannis Efstathiou v. The Police,Criminal Procedure––Plea in mitigation after plea of Guilty––Facts put forward amounting to plea of Not Guilty––Course to be followed by trial Judge.
1957 Nov. 7, 1958 Jan. 11.Appeal No. 4230Civil AppealNicos Mina Ellinas v. Athanasia Yianni and Others,Evidence––Certificates of Village Authorities customarily issued for purposes of local enquiries by the Land Registry––Whether admissible in evidence. Evidence La,. Cap. 15, Sect. 3. Sect. 4–– Inadmissible on the principle of hearsay where the facts recorded therein are not within the personal knowledge of those who issue the certificate––In a proper case certificates may be received in evidence when the Village Authority are personally familiar with the matters recorded and could not be called as witnesses for some good reason under the Evidence Law, Cap.15 Sect.4(2)–– Inadmissible document received in evidence without objection–– Duty of the trial Court and, in default, of the Court of Appeal to reject it. Practice––Appeal––Misreception of evidence––New trial––When new trial will be ordered––Civil Procedure Rules, 0.35, r.9. Costs. Costs disallowed to the successful Appellant because objections were not taken to the reception of the aforesaid two certificates–– Observations of the Court as to receiving in evidence files in bundle of any department, including files of Law Courts.
1957 Oct.9, Nov. 5Appeal No. 4228Civil AppealEkaterini Lymperopoulou v. Michalakis Christodoulou,Fraudulent Transfer––Transfer of goods––Invalid against a creditor intended to be defrauded––" Subsequent creditors " not protected ––Fraudulent Transfers Avoidance Law, Cap. 95, sections 2, 3 and 5.
1957 Sept.25, Oct.12Appeal No. 4221Civil AppealThe Hellenic Mining Co. Ltd. v. Lissani Mousli,Workmen's Compensation––Injury suffered out of and in the course of employment––Tests applied––Exoneration of employer from liability––Workmen's Compensation Law, Cap. 216, section 6.
1957 Sep. 26, Oct.12Appeal No. 4223Civil AppealErini Papantoniou v. The Attorney-General and Another,Practice––Action against Government––Declaratory Judgment–– Attorney–General Defendant––Fiat of Governor necessary–– Courts of Justice Law, 1953, section 64. Jurisdiction–– Action against Government––Declaratory Judgment –– Action maintainable in District Court. Action against Government––Declaratory Judgment––Petitions of Right Act, 1860.
1958 Dec.4, 1959 Feb.4Appeal No. 4266Civil AppealMehmet Ali Sulay v. Ananiya Kazandjian,Rent Restriction––Premises used as a shoe shop––Recovery of possession or ejectment––Compensation for loss of occupation–– Method of assessment-Matters to be excluded-Rent (Control) Law 1954 ss. 18 and 19.

Karar Adı
Karar Tarihi
Ahmet ACAR- TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Şubat 1995
Ahmet BATMAZ ve Diğerleri- TÜRKİYE Davası 29 Mart 2002
AKA-TÜRKİYE DAVASI23 Eylül 1998
AKDIVAR VE DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI (50. MADDE)1 Nisan 1998
AKKUŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 9 Temmuz 1997
AKTAŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 9 Temmuz 1997
AKYAZI-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 30 Ekim 2001
ARSLAN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Haziran 1999
ARAP YALGIN VE DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Eylül 2001
ATEŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI22 NİSAN 2003
AYDIN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Eylül 1997
AYTEKİN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI23 Eylül 1998
BAHADDAR-HOLLANDA KARARI26 Kasım 1996
BAŞKAYA VE OKÇUOĞLU-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
BOTTA-İTALYA KARARI-
BÜKER-TÜRKİYE DAVASI24 Ekim 2000
CEYLAN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
ÇAKICI-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
ÇIRAKLAR-TÜRKİYE'YE KARŞI DAVASI28 Ekim 1998
Derdi ÇALLI - TÜRKİYE DAVASI 2 Mayıs 2002
ECER VE ZEYREK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI27 Şubat 2001
ERDAGÖZ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI22 Eylül 1997
ERDOĞDU VE İNCE-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
ERGİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI28 Temmuz 1998
Fiiliyet Şen-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Ekim 2002
GERGER-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
GÜNDEM-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 MAYIS 1998
GÜNDOĞAN -TÜRKİYE DAVASI10 Ekim 2002
Halise DEMİREL-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 21 Ekim 1998
Hamza Yılmaz - TÜRKİYE DAVASI -
Hüsniye Adalı-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Ekim 2002
JABARİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI11 Temmuz 2000
KALAÇ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI1 Temmuz 19997
KARAKOÇ VE DİĞERLERİ -TÜRKİYE DAVASI15 Ekim 2002
KARATAŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
KAYA-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 19 Şubat 1998
KILIÇ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI28 Mart 2000
KINAY VE KINAY - TÜRKİYE DAVASI 21 Mayıs 1996
KIZILÖZ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Eylül 2001
KURT-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Mayıs 1998
MACİR-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 22 Nisan 2003
MAHMUT ALINAK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI17 Ekim 2000
MANSUR-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Haziran 1995
MEHMET ALİ YILMAZ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Eylül 2001
MENTEŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI28 Kasım 1997
MERİNÇ - TÜRKİYE DAVASI17 Haziran 2003
METE DEMİRKOL - TÜRKİYE DAVASI 21 Ekim 2002
OĞUR-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 20 Mayıs 1999
ÖZDEP-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Aralık 1999
ÖZGÜR GÜNDEM-TÜRKİYE DAVASI16 Mart 2000
ÖZTÜRK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI28 Eylül 1999
POLAT-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Haziran 1999
RAMAZAN AKBULUT-
SABUKTEKİN- TÜRKİYE DAVASI 19 Mart 2002
SAKIK VE DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI26 Kasım 1997
SATIK ve DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI10 Ekim 2000
SATIK, ÇAMLI VE MARAŞLI -TÜRKİYE DAVASI22 Ekim 2002
SELÇUK VE ASKER-TÜRKİYE DAVASI24 Nisan 1998
SEVTAP VEZNEDAROĞLU-TÜRKİYE DAVASI11 Nisan 2000
SOSYALİST PARTİ VE DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Mayıs 1998
SUR-TÜRKİYE DAVASI3 Ekim 1997
SÜREK VE ÖZDEMİR-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
SÜREK -TÜRKİYE DAVASI (No:2)8 Temmuz 1999
SÜREK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI (No:3)8 Temmuz 1999
SÜREK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI (No:4) 8 Temmuz 1999
SÜREK-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Temmuz 1999
Şaziment Yalçın –TÜRKİYE DAVASI 8 Ekim 2002
ŞENER-TÜRKİYE'YE KARŞI 18 Temmuz 2000
TANRIKULU-TÜRKİYE KARARI8 Temmuz 1999
TAŞ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 14 Kasım 2000
TEKİN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI9 Haziran 1998
TÜRKİYE BİRLEŞİK KOMİNİST PARTİSİ VE DİĞERLERİ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI30 Ocak 1998
ÜLKÜ DOĞAN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI19 Haziran 2003
YAĞCI VE SARGIN-TÜRKİYE DAVASI8 Haziran 1995
YAĞIZ-TÜRKİYE DAVASI7 Ağustos 1996
YAŞA-TÜRKİYE DAVASI 2 Eylül 1998
Zahide GÜLER VE DİĞERLERİ - TÜRKİYE DAVASI 3 Mart 2003
ZANA-TÜRKİYE DAVASI25 Kasım 1997
Zeynep AVCI - TÜRKİYE DAVASI6 Şubat 2003
CASE OF CYPRUS VS TURKEY10 Mayıs 2001
CASE OF ADALI VS TURKEY12 Ekim 2005
CASE OF KAKOULLI VS TURKEY22 Şubat 2006
CASE OF XENIDES VS ARESTIS22 Mart 2006
CASE OF DEMADES VS TURKEY31 Ekim 2003
CASE OF EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS v[1]. TURKEY31 Ekim 2003
CASE OF LOIZIDOU VS.TURKEY



Untitled Document
 

Yasalar | Kararlar | Tüzükler | Mahkemeler Hakkında | Sıkça sorulan Sorular | Bağlantı Kurun